With his expertise in urban planning, Hanna is pledging to greatly boost the public consultation mechanisms at the disposal of City of Montreal officials if he is elected.
Vision Montreal’s David B. Hanna hopes to win back NDG
If anyone is intimating there could be resistance to Vision Montreal here in the west end because the party is led by former PQ cabinet minister Louise Harel, what of Diane Lemieux who was also in the PQ cabinet and is now running for the incumbent Union Montreal?
“Let’s put it this way,” says VM candidate David B. Hanna, an urban planning professor at UQAM who is running in the district of NDG. “Now that everybody has their Péquiste, where does it leave the anglo voter?”
He points out that former Vision leader Benoît Labonté, who stepped aside to allow Harel to step in and effectively revitalize the party (especially in Montreal’s east end), is ironically a staunch federalist with a track record of accomplishments in the federal sphere.
“Our party is a coalition, shall we say, of ideas and different political stripes, in the same fashion the Union is,” he says. “The Union is a coalition that is neither federalist nor separatist.” He notes that Union executive committee member André Lavallée was Louise Harel’s political attaché at one time. “Let’s not lose sight of that. So where is the difference? The difference to me is not so much in who’s PQ or who’s federalist, which frankly is irrevelant, I think, to municipal politics.
“That’s not what any of us are here for. We’re not here to either take Quebec out of Confederation or to keep it in. We’re not the ones deciding this issue. It’s not here it’s going to be decided. We want to make Montreal work and my contention is that the big difference is that Union has the corruption and we don’t. We’re promising to clean up. They basically have police investigations and it’s going to be very hard for them to demonstrate to voters how suddenly they magically transformed themselves into a clean and democratic party.”
Montreal’s west end was never as fertile electorally for Vision Montreal as the east end, even under former mayor and VM leader Pierre Bourque. While Bourque’s party was able to win a majority of seats and effectively gain control of city council following the 1998 election, it was largely with support from districts in the east, after which Vision’s fortunes went into a dive and Union Montreal gained a footing at City Hall.
However, Hanna is running in an area of the west end where Vision Montreal scored a crucial victory in 1998. Bourque loyalist and insider Sonya Biddle defeated longtime Montreal city councillor Sam Boskey, who was one of only two city councillors belonging to the devoutly left-wing Democratic Coalition party at that time. Marcel Tremblay won it for the Union in 2001 and 2005. But with Tremblay running for mayor now in the Borough of Villeray/St-Michel/Park Extension, the task of retaining the seat for the Union has fallen to CSDM school commissioner Marie-José Mastromonaco, a relative newcomer to municipal politics.
While Hanna’s wife, Diane, is perhaps better known among readers of west end community news because of her frequent appearances before the Côte des Neiges-NDG borough council and her strident opposition to the borough’s handling of the Benny Sports and Recreation Complex project, David Hanna’s Vision Montreal biography describes him as “being a critic of the undemocratic process related to the Benny Center.”
With his expertise in urban planning, Hanna is pledging to greatly boost the public consultation mechanisms at the disposal of City of Montreal officials if he is elected. He refers to the failure by centre city mayor Gérald Tremblay and borough mayor Michael Applebaum to fully use available consultation processes as “false democracy” and promises, “They’re going to be used every time now and it’s going to be systematic. No more finessing and fudging. That’s our guarantee.”
Patrick McDonnell
Comment online since October 20th 2009From gazette
One trait the Vision Montréal leader put on display Sunday when interviewed on Radio-Canada’s Tout le monde en parle was slipperiness.
Here is the first question put to the former Parti Québécois minister: “You are one of the makers of the controversial municipal mergers for which many Quebecers have still not forgiven the PQ. You are a strong sovereignist. You are criticized for not speaking English very well. How do you expect to persuade federalists, anglophones and those still upset over the mergers to vote for you?” Fine question.
To allow you to appreciate how Harel tackled it, I’ll quote her response in full: “Those who were really against the merger – the (people of) the 15 municipalities from the island’s western part – left Montreal in 2005. The program of Vision Montreal, and its renewed team, will allow us to return to normal. It is not normal for a mayor not to know what is happening (with public-works contracts) in his city. It is not normal! A mayor has a duty to know!” And on she went, attacking Mayor Gérald Tremblay, who was also on the show.
Notice how she minimized popular dissent over the forced mergers, failed to address sovereignty and English, claimed her party program and slate will be a solution without saying how, and never hinted at what “normal” means. Then she changed the subject by launching a diversionary attack on her rival on an entirely unrelated matter.
It was vintage Harel. Evade, evade, evade. In imposing the mergers, for example, she evaded all public consultation at which she would have to deal with tough questions.